Sangram Welfare Society v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3181 of 2022 ====================================================== Sangram Welfare Society Gram Panchayat Raj Masaurha, Block- Piparahi, P.S.- Piparahi, District- Sheohar through the Secretary Shyambabu Gupta, aged about 37 years, Male, S/o Kamal Prasad Gupta, resident of VillageMasaurha, P.S.- Piparahi, District- Sheohar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary Gramin Vikash Vibhag, Old Secretariat, Patna. 3.
The Secretary Bihar Rural Development Society, Patna. 4.
The Joint Secretary MNREGA, Patna.
5.
The District Officer-cum- District Programme Co-ordinator MNREGA, Sheohar.
6.
The District Development Commissioner District Gramin Vikash Abhikaran, Sheohar-cum- Additional District Programme Co-ordinator, Sheohar. 7.
The District Planning Officer Sheohar.
8.
The Block Development Officer Piparahi, District- Sheohar. 9.
The Block Programme Officer Piparahi, District- Sheohar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kumod Kumar Shrivastaw For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Anjani Kumar, AAG 4 Mr. Alok Kumar Rahi, AC to AAG 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.) Date : 11-03-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-
2/4
3/4 After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Court not to be in favour with the submissions made across the Bar, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that petitioner be permitted to take recourse to such equally, efficacious alternative remedies as are otherwise available in law, including the MANREGA Scheme.
Permission granted.
We clarify that we have not adjudicated the dispute on merits. All questions of fact and law are left open to be agitated and adjudicated before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
As and when such proceeding is initiated, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.
4/4 Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) Sujit/Ashwini AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 22.03.2022 Transmission Date