Gopal Kumar @ Gopal Prasad Sinha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10959 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-500 Year-2016 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Gopal Kumar @ Gopal Prasad Sinha Son Of Shiv Shankar Prasad Sinha Resident Of Mohalla- Purnai Bazar, Near Mahila Vidya Mandir, D.S.C. Office Ke Pass, Police Station- Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Dr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 504 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the complainant in the complaint petition alleges that she was cheated of Rs.3,50,000/- as the sale deed executed in her favour by Sudhir Singh with regard to land was already sold from before to Sarvan Singh and Mina Devi, who did not allow the complainant to take possession of the land in question.
The learned counsel submits that from bare perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that Sudhir Singh had executed a sale deed in favour of the complainant with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10959 of 2022(2) dt.22-08-2022 2/2 respect to his land, but when she went to take possession, the same was objected by Sarvan Singh and Mina Devi on the ground that the alleged land was already purchased by them from before from Sudhir Singh. The learned counsel next submits that petitioner is the deed writer, as such, he was not fully aware of the earlier transaction. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the anticipatory bail application.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Complaint Case No.500C of 2016, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T