Ganit Yadav @ Ganit Kyadav @ Ganit v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20587 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2020 Thana- SAHARGHAT District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ganit Yadav @ Ganit Kyadav @ Ganit Son Of Ram Yadav R/O VillageBokaha, P.S.- Saharghat, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 20-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection wtih Saharghat P.S. Case No. 40 of 2020 instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, when the informant was running water pump machine, his cousin brother and his mother started abusing him. When the informant went to his house and forbade them to abuse, all the accused persons including the petitioner assaulted the informant by fists. On hulla, his cousin

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20587 of 2021(2) dt.20-12-2021 2/2 sister Nika Devi gave iron rod to the petitioner from which he assaulted the informant as a result of which he sustained cut injury over his head and he became senseless and fell down. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. As a matter of fact, in a family dispute, there was case and counter case. Both parties sustained injuries. As per injury report, the injuries sustained by the informant are simple in nature Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Saharghat P.S. Case No. 40 of 2020, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-II, Benipatti, Madhubani, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U