Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18870/2017dismissed

Golden Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-25Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No 18870 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -100 Year- 2016 Thana -NATIONAL HIGHWAY DistrictSAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Golden Kumar Son of Praveen Kumar Singh Resident of VillageMukhtiarpur, Police Station- Bhagwanpur, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with National Highway Bangra Police Station Case No 100 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115, 120B, 414 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1B)A/26/35 of the Arms Act. Petitioner is named in the first information report and it has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from his possession nor he has been put on test identification parade and he is in custody since 08.11.2016 and other accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court which will appear from Annexure 2 series.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18870 of 2017 (2) dt.25-04-2017 2/2 Heard learned APP also. Learned APP opposed the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and from perusal of the record, it appears that the petitioner is named in the FIR and apart from this case, he is accused in three other cases also. As such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. However, considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody, the learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period nine months and if not concluded, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) M.E.H./- U T