Mohan Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11307 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-460 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Gaya ====================================================== Mohan Ravidas S/O Late Rambalak Ravidas R/O Village- Emayatpur, P.S.- Tankuppa, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 31-03-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by order dated 17-2-2026, case diary was called for, but the same till date has not been received.

4.

The court will not wait endlessly for the case diary. 5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. 6.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11307 of 2026(3) dt.31-03-2026 2/3 petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the seized vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated, it is further submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that Surendra would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged, who was also apprehended from the spot. 7.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

8.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Excise Case No. 460 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. 9.

It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11307 of 2026(3) dt.31-03-2026 3/3 then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T