Hiranand Rai @ Hiranand Ray v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16727 of 2018 ====================================================== Hiranand Rai @ Hiranand Ray Son of Ram Awadh, Ex.- Acting Headmaster, Sarvoday Higher Secondary (+2) School Bhagwanpur, Police StationAwatarnagar, District- Saran and at Present residing of Q.No. 11/361 Ram Gulam Tola, Near Subhash Vidhlay, Deoria, Deoria Uttar Pradesh PIN274001. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Deptt. Of Education, New Secretariat, Vikas Bhawan, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Vikas Bhawan, Patna 3.

The Director (Secondary Education), Department of Education, Bihar Secondary Education Officer, Budh 4.

The District Education Officer, Saran.

5.

The District Provident Fund Officer, Saran.

6.

The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

7.

The Chief Account Officer, Posted in the Office of Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

8.

The Headmaster, Sarvoday Higher Secondary 2 School, Bhagwanpur, P.S.- Awaton Nagar, District- Sar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kr. Roy - SC 13 For the A.G.

:

Mr.Raj Nandan Prasad, Advocate Mr.Vishesh Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-04-2023 Heard Mr. Bijay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy, learned SC 13 appearing for the respondents and Mr.Vishesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Accountant General.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.16727 of 2018(6) dt.03-04-2023 2/3 Respondent/State informs this Court that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. He further informs that 90% pension and gratuity has already been paid on 5.7.2019 to the petitioner, leave encashment has been sanctioned for total amount of Rs.4,72,220/- vide memo no.3265 dated 26.11.2019, group insurance has also been sanctioned for its payment amounting to Rs.1,52,226/- vide memo No.3264 dated 26.11.2019. The entire amount of the provident fund could not be paid to the petitioner on account of certain objections raised, however, an amount of Rs.11,33,046 along with up-to-date interest has been calculated up to 30.11.2020 and has been sanctioned, vide dispatch no.FP/428 dated 8.12.2020. The District Programme Officer send the bill on 14.12.2020 to the Treasury Officer, Chapra for making payment through CFMS on 23.12.2020 successfully.

3. Considering the fact that all the retiral dues have already been sanctioned/paid to the petitioner, the grievance of the petitioner seems to have been redressed, however, if the petitioner is still aggrieved for non-payment of any retiral dues under any head, he may file representation before the appropriate authority and he may also claim interest on account of delayed payment.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16727 of 2018(6) dt.03-04-2023 3/3

4. In view of the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition stands consigned. (Purnendu Singh, J) chn/- U