Rajesh Sao And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.8574 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -461 Year- 2016 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Rajesh Sao, S/o Sri Jagdeo Sao, Resident of Mohalla- Manpur Kumhar Toli, P.S.- Moffasil, District- Gaya.
2. Sunil Kumar, S/o Gobind Paswan, R/o Village- Kahudag, P.S.- Barachatti, District- Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Petitioners are languishing in custody for offences punishable under Section 279/308/272/273/120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a)/32(2)/38/47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
From the auto rickshaw of the petitioners forty liters of liquor was recovered.
The petitioners are in custody since 19.11.2016. Petitioners have stated on oath that they have got no criminal antecedent.
Considering the aforesaid facts, let petitioners, above
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8574 of 2017 (3) dt.10-04-2017 2/2 named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya/Successor Court, in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 461 of 2016, with condition that petitioners shall file undertaking at the time of furnishing of the bail-bonds before the Court-below that they would not indulge themselves in such activity otherwise the Court below shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail-bonds of the petitioners in this case. (Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T