Mangal Sada v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9399 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-320 Year-2017 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

Mangal Sada S/o Bhola Sada R/o vill - Rauta Musahari, P.S.- Bakhari, Distt.- Begusarai 2.

Parmeshwar Sada @ Prameswar Sada S/o Ramchandar Sada R/o vill - Rauta Musahari, P.S.- Bakhari, Distt.- Begusarai 3.

Arjun Sada S/o Lalit Sada R/o vill - Rauta Musahari, P.S.- Bakhari, Distt.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for grant of bail in connection with Bakhari P.S. Case No. 320 of 2017 registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 504, 506, 307, 384, 387, 379 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that petitioners along with others being armed with deadly weapons came and started abusing the informant and demanded rangdari. It is further alleged that the petitioners along with others started assaulting indiscriminately and in that assault Birju Sahni, Gajo Yadav and Sahbaz Alam received injuries.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9399 of 2025(2) dt.11-02-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. From perusal of the order of the trial court, it transpires that the victims have received simple injuries and the nature of allegation is general and omnibus. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, they are languishing in judicial custody since 27.10.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the custody of the petitioners, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Bakhari P.S. Case No. 320 of 2017 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Begusarai.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) shubham/- U T