Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9881/2017bail granted

Rinku Prasad @ Vidhayak v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-01Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9881 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -518 Year- 2016 Thana -MUFFASIL DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Rinku Prasad @ Vidhayak, son of Late Gard Prasad, resident of Shanti Nagar, P.S. Bettiah town, District West Champaran .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Asha Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Bettiah Muffasil P.S.Case No. 518 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 35, 38 and 41 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has clean antecedent and has remained in custody for two months and only allegation against him is that 13.83 litres of foreign liquor has been recovered from his possession. Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that petitioner has clean antecedent and has remained in custody for two months, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand)

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9881 of 2017 (2) dt.01-03-2017 2/2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, in connection with Bettiah Muffasil P.S.Case No. 518 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U