Arvind Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20694 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -131 Year- 2014 Thana -JHAJHA District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Arvind Yadav S/o Late Damodar Yadav, Resident of VillageJogiyatilha, P.S.- Jhajha, District- Jamui. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 08.12.2016 in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 131 of 2014, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/120B Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner's name has transpired in this case only on the basis of suspicion and save and except that there is nothing against the petitioner so as to connect him in the present case. Petitioner has been languishing in judicial custody since 08.12.2016. Learned counsel for the State also could not controvert the above submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. Having heard both sides, considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the period of custody and also that petitioner's name transpired in this case only on the basis of suspicion, as such, let the petitioner above named, be released on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20694 of 2017 (2) dt.08-05-2017 2/2 bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Jamui, in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 131 of 2014, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T