Abdul Motallib v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3515 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.

Abdul Motallib Son of Late Md. Khalil Resident of Village- Khanguradih, P.S.- Katra, District- Muzaffarpur.

2.

Md. Anamul Son of Late Abdulsubhan Resident of Village- Khanguradih, P.S.- Katra, District- Muzaffarpur.

3.

Md. Tahir Son of Late Md. Mansur Resident of Village- Khanguradih, P.S.- Katra, District- Muzaffarpur.

4.

Abdul Jabbar Son of Md. Mashuk Resident of Village- Khanguradih, P.S.- Katra, District- Muzaffarpur.

5.

Upendra Prasad Son of Late Sunaina Devi @ Hirdeo Prasad Resident of Village- Khanguradih, P.S.- Katra, District- Muzaffarpur. 6.

Rajiv Kumar Jha Son of Late Govind Jha Resident of Village- Khanguradih, P.S.- Katra, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Land Revenue Department.

2.

The Secretary Land Acquisition and Land Reform Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Joint Secretary cum Director Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate cum Collector, Muzaffarpur. 5.

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Gandak Yojna, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Uday Prakash Shrarma, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ajani Kumar, AAG-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition may be disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to file an objection in Certificate Case No. 202 of

Patna High Court CWJC No.3515 of 2021(4) dt.15-07-2024 2/2 2019-20 filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Gandak Yojna, Muzaffarpur, against the petitioner for recovery of Rs.2,54,782. He further submits that the Certificate Officer has already issued notice to the petitioner.

3. In view of the aforesaid, the petitioner is directed to file an objection before the Certificate Officer, within a period of four weeks from today and the Certificate Officer is directed to pass a reasoned order in accordance with law.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition stand disposed of with the aforesaid direction.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) vinayak/- U