Priyanshu Kumar @ Golu Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9691 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-304 Year-2024 Thana- SARAIYA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Priyanshu Kumar @ Golu Pandey S/O Kaushal Pandey Village- Sain Khajuri P.S. - Kanti, Dist.- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 14-05-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 304 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the allegation, some unknown accused persons, looted away the motorcycle of the informant at the gunpoint.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The looted motorcycle was recovered from the possession of co-accused Vikash Manjhi and in his confessional statement, the name of the petitioner has been figured. Except that, there is nothing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9691 of 2025(3) dt.14-05-2025 2/2 against the petitioner in the entire case diary. The petitioner is under custody since 12.08.2024.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. From perusal of the case diary, it appears that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and his name has figured in the confessional statement of coaccused. Except that, there is no incriminating material against the petitioner.

7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances especially the clean antecedent of the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, is directed to furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-IV, Muzaffarpur in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 304 of 2024, subject to the following conditions that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T