Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10234/2019bail granted

Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-02-20Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10234 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1341 Year-2018 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== SUNIL KUMAR Son of Late Rajesh Kumar Singh Resident of MohallaAkharaghat, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhay Shankar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 1341 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26/35 of Arms Act.

Allegation is recovery of one country made pistol from co-accused, however, as far as petitioner is concerned, nothing has been recovered from his possession. He has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 18.12.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10234 of 2019(2) dt.20-02-2019 2/2 C.J.M., Muzaffarpur, in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 1341 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T