Abdul Latif v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10604 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2018 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== ABDUL LATIF, Son of Late Samsul Khalifa, Resident of Village - Bhachharpur, Ward No. 8, P.S.- PUPRI, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pushpendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 290 of 2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 498A, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegation against the petitioner, who happens to be father-in-law of the informant, and others is of subjecting the informant to cruelty with respect to demand and also trying to kill her by putting rope on her neck.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the materials collected during investigation clearly disclosed that the allegation is not specific against the petitioner, rather other family members and furthermore the injuries are simple in nature.
Heard learned APP and learned counsel for the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10604 of 2019(3) dt.26-04-2019 2/2 informant, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail stating that there is specific allegation against the petitioner and injuries were found on the person of the informant also. Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, let petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the receipt of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Pupri P.S.Case No. 290 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T