Pintu Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8974 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -201 Year- 2016 Thana -LAXMIPUR District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Pintu Sah son of Bundeli Sah Resident of village- Gaura, P.S. - Laxmipur, District - Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 19.11.2016 in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 201 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 364(A) of Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of Explosive Substance Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that now the victim boy has returned in this case, however, no statement has been recorded from him by the police or by the Court and the boy could not recognize anyone. The charge-sheet has been submitted in this case and the petitioner has been languishing in judicial custody four more than three months.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having heard both sides, in this case, the victim boy has been recovered and nothing has come on record so as to show the complicity of this petitioner, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8974 of 2017 (2) dt.27-02-2017 2/2 Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-III, Jamui, in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 201 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T