← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5678/2019disposed

Gopal Harijan @ Gopal Ji Akela And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-04-11Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5678 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Gopal Harijan @ Gopal Ji Akela, male, aged about 57 years, Son of late Chikhuri Harijan, Resident of Village- Nainijore, P.O. Bakulari, P.S. Guthani, District- Siwan.

2.

Deonath Ram, male, aged about 56 years, Son of Late Janki Ram, Resident of Village- Nizampur, P.O. Sahlaur, P.S. Panchrukhi, District- Siwan. 3.

Mukhlal Ram, male, aged about 56 years, Son of Late Babu Ram, Resident of Village- Shivdah, P.O. Jalalpur, P.S. Gautam Budh Nagar Tarwara, District- Siwan.

4.

Brahma Pandey, male, aged about 57 years, Son of Late Ramnandan Pandey, Resident of Village- Supuali, P.O. Itwan, P.S. Panchrukhi, District- Siwan. 5.

Bashistha Harijan, male, aged about 56 years, Son of Late Rajpati Ram, Resident of Village- Bhagwanpur, P.O. Bhaluan, P.S. Guthani, DistrictSiwan. 6.

Jagdish Ram, male, aged about 57 years, Son of Late Mangru Ram, Resident of Village Sangrampur, P.O. Satwar, P.S. Gautam Budh Nagar Tarwara, District- Siwan.

7.

Ramesh Baitha, male, aged about 55 years, Son of Fulena Baitha, Resident of Village- Belusi, P.O. Kisunpali, P.S. Darauli, District- Siwan. 8.

Binod Kumar Pandey, male, aged about 57 years, Son of Late Shivnath Pandey, Resident of Village and P.O. Barkagon, P.S.Saraw, District- Siwan. 9.

Rabindra Prasad, male, aged about 58 years, Son of Late Shivnath Prasad, Resident of Village and P.O. Sarsar, P.S. Siwan Muffasil, District-Siwan. 10.

Kanhaiya Prasad, male, aged about 56 years, Son of Late Chandrika Prasad, Resident of Village- Purbanchal Tola, P.O. Dhepha, P.S. Jiradei, DistrictSiwan. 11.

Satraj Prasad, male, aged about 56 years, Son of Late Banwari Sah, Resident of Village and P.O. Amlori, P.S. Muffasil, District- Siwan. 12.

Mohan Ram, male, aged about 55 years, Son of Late Bandhu Ram, Resident of Village- Karmani Hata, P.O. Tarwan, P.S. Siwan Muffasil, District- Siwan. 13.

Harindra Ram, male, aged about 57 years, Son of Late Garib Ram, Resident of Village and P.O. Dahibhatta, P.S. Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Patna High Court CWJC No.5678 of 2019 dt.11-04-2019 2/3

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate, Siwan.

5.

The Senior Deputy Collector, Nazarat Branch, Siwan, District- Siwan. 6.

The Incharge Additional Collector, Siwan, District- Siwan. 7.

The Deputy Collector (Establishment), Siwan, District- Siwan. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Raj Kishore Roy ( GP-18 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 11-04-2019 The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is exactly similar to the case of the petitioner in C.W.J.C. No. 11202 of 2016 (Arjun Prasad Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.).

2. In the aforesaid case, a Bench of this Court vide judgment and order dated 29.05.2018, has directed the District Magistrate, Siwan to take appropriate steps, which was already initiated by him, to its logical conclusion and consider the case of the petitioner in a positive manner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.5678 of 2019 dt.11-04-2019 3/3

3. Under the aforesaid circumstances, this Court only deems it appropriate to direct the concerned respondent to look into the facts of the case of the petitioner as well as facts of the case of the petitioners of C.W.J.C. No. 11202 of 2016, referred to above, and if it is found that the case of the petitioner is covered by the aforesaid decision of this Court, the same benefit be given to the petitioner.

4. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed off.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) Praveen-II/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 16.04.2019 Transmission Date N/A