Dharmendra Sah @ Dharo Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12380 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-524 Year-2025 Thana- BALIYA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Dharmendra Sah @ Dharo Sah Son of Bishundeo Sah Resident of Village - Shiv Nagar, Bahadur Nagar, Bind Toli, Kutlupur Diyara, P.S. - Muffasil Munger, District - Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nakul Kumar Jamuar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Ballia P.S. Case No. 524 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 127(2), 140(3), 352, 351(2), 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the brother of the informant namely, Ankit Kumar was boarded on a vehicle and was forced to marry the sister of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12380 of 2026(3) dt.24-03-2026 2/2 that only allegation against the petitioner is that he has said the brother of the informant to marry his sister. He further submits that the allegation of threatening and boarding the brother of informant in a vehicle is not against the petitioner. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 27.11.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Ballia P.S. Case No. 524 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T