Govind Sahni @ Surendra Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5807 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -211 Year- 2016 Thana -SAKRA District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Govind Sahni @ Surendra Sahni Son of Bilash Sahni @ Ram Bilash Sahni Resident of Village- Harlo Chanpur Sukki, P.S. Patepur, DistrictVaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Alok Kumar Alok Mr.Hans Lal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ashok Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-02-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Sakra P.S.Case No.211/2016 for the offence under Sections 25(1-b)A, 25(1-A), 25(1-AA), 25(1-AAA), 26(2) of the Arms Act and 16, 17, 18, 20, 22, and 23 of UAP Act.

The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that one Pistol and two cartridges were recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he is in custody for about six months. It is further submitted that at the same time, he had also been remanded in two other cases but he is on bail in both cases. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides. In view of the fact that one Pistol

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5807 of 2017 (2) dt.17-02-2017 2/2 and two cartridges have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he is in custody for about six months, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sakra P.S.Case No.211 of 2016 With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U