Manchlal Sah v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57685 of 2015 (3) dt.19-02-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.57685 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -132 Year- 2015 Thana -GOPALPUR District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Manchlal Sah, Son of Manni Sah, resident of Village- Sadhuwa, Police Station Gopalpur, District- Bhagalpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pronati Singh (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is accused in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 132 of 2015 registered under Sections 302 and 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that there is specific allegation against the four named accused, Sumit Yadav, Arbind Yadav, Sarbind Yadav and Dimpal Yadav to chased Bhola Manda, son of the informant, and shot fire at him causing his death but only the name of the petitioner has been disclosed by the informant having hand in the conspiracy of murder of Bhola Mandal. It is further
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57685 of 2015 (3) dt.19-02-2016 submitted that petitioner is accused in one another case, in which, he is on bail and is in custody since 18.06.2015. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Naugachia, Bhagalpur, in connection with S.T. No. 577 of 2015. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T