Gurudev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13189 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-630 Year-2023 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Gurudev Kumar S/O Late Achchelal Bhagat R/O Village- Inarwa, P.SMadhuban, Distt.- East Champarn. 2.

Santosh Kumar S/O Ramchandra Bhagat R/O Village- Inarwa, P.SMadhuban, Distt.- East Champarn. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Indu Kumari Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case in connection with Madhubani P.S. Case No. 630/2023 dated 28.12.2023 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 116.25 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the car.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. Nothing has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13189 of 2024(2) dt.05-03-2024 2/3 been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners hence, no case is made out against the petitioners. The petitioners are neither the owner nor the driver of the said vehicle. Learned Counsel has relied on the judgment of Full Bench of Hon'ble Patna High Court in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar reported in 2019 (2) PLJR 1089. The Full Bench in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav (supra) has held that an application for anticipatory bail in a case arising out of Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act can be maintained, despite the bar under Section 76 (2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13189 of 2024(2) dt.05-03-2024 3/3 each to the satisfaction of learned court concerned, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 630/2023, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

7. This application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T