Abhishek Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14612 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-496 Year-2023 Thana- BARHARA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== ABHISHEK KUMAR S/O BIRENDRA KUMAR R/O VILLAGECHHOTAKI SANADIYA, P.S- ARA MUFASSIL, DISTT.- BHOJPUR. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Diwakar, Advocate :

Mr. Shivam Kumar, Advocate :

Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate :

Ms. Priya Kumari, Advocate :

Mr. Sudhakar Ranjan, Advocate :

Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate :

Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 11-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Barhara (Krishnagarh O.P.) P.S. case No. 496 of 2023 instituted for the offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that three unknown

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14612 of 2024(2) dt.11-03-2024 2/3 miscreants assaulted the informant and snatched his bag containing Rs. 41,860/- alongwith his tab, mobile phone, some job documents etc. and fled away.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused Sandeep Singh in some other case. No stolen article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that T.I.P. has not been conducted till date. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 18.10.2023 and has thee criminal antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14612 of 2024(2) dt.11-03-2024 3/3 below/concerned Court in connection with Barhara (Krishnagarh O.P.) P.S. case No. 496 of 2023. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T