Gurupujan Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13922 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -196 Year- 2016 Thana -CHENARI District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Gurupujan Ram, son of Late Chirkut Ram, resident of VillageNarayanpur, Police Station- Chenari, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Shamimul Hoda, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Chenari P.S.Case No. 196 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per learned counsel for the petitioner, the case has been lodged against the petitioner only on the basis of misunderstanding as the tractor of the informant was traceless and he is in custody for more than three months and charge-sheet has also been submitted in this case. It has also been submitted that the impugned order shows that informant has filed a petition in court to the effect that due to misunderstanding the case has been lodged.

Heard learned APP also, who has not controverted the above submission.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13922 of 2017 (2) dt.24-03-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram, in connection with Chenari P.S.Case No. 196 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U