Angad Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10086 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-224 Year-2019 Thana- SHRIKRISHNAPURI District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
ANGAD SINGH, Son of Raghuvar Singh Resident of Village - Barsingha, P.S.- Bihiyan, Distt - Ara (Bhojpur).
2.
Lav-Kush Singh, Son of Late Sudish Singh, Resident of Village - Udaymanpur, P.S.- Krishnagarh, Distt - Bhojpur (Ara) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bhim Kumar Yadav, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha, APP.
For the Informant :
Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-09-2020 This matter has been taken up through Video Conferencing.
Heard the parties.
The petitioners are languishing in custody for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 452, 379, 427, 506, 386, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail on the ground of refusal of bail to the co-accused by this Court.
Considering the grant of bail to the co-accused Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar Singh by the Hon'ble Supreme Court as well as the fact that allegation against the petitioners is on similar footing and investigation of the case is already complete,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10086 of 2020(4) dt.07-09-2020 2/2 let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20000/- (Twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Sri Krishnapuri P.S. Case No. 224 of 2019, with following conditions:
(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.
(b) The petitioners shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners.
(c) The petitioners shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.
(Birendra Kumar, J) mantreshwar/- U T