Anjum Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9607 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2016 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== ANJUM KHATOON, Wife of Md. Yasin, aged about 42 years, Female, Resident of Village - Bishahariya, P.S-Bhargama, Dist.-Araria. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Kundan Kumar Singh, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Dashrath Mehta, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-05-2019 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody since 26.10.2018 in a case for the offence registered under Sections 364/34 of the IPC.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the daughter of the informant, namely, Gulesha Khatoon was married with the co-accused Md. Ibrar @ Bablu before two years and she was living at her matrimonial home. It is further alleged that on 10.10.2016, the informant heard that at about 5.30 A.M. the petitioner alongwith other co-accused persons named in the F.I.R. have kidnapped his daughter and her son Md. Arif, aged about 12 years, with intent to kill them. The informant went to the house of his daughter, but the accused persons were not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9607 of 2019(4) dt.02-05-2019 2/2 present at the house.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The victim was mentally ill and she always used to leave the house on her own will. This fact has not been controverted by learned counsel for the informant. On behalf of the learned counsels for the State informant, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Araria, in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 147/2016, G.R. No. 3411/2016.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T