Ranjit Ram @ Guddu Ram @ Ranjeet Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9614 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2016 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Ranjit Ram @ Guddu Ram @ Ranjeet Ram Son of Vasantlal Ram Resident of Village -Vishunpur Vashant @ Subhai, Police Station -Hajipur Sadar, DistVaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjeet Kumar, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Dalsing Sarai PS. Case No. 137 of 2016 dated 10.04.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per allegation, three unknown Motorcyclists fired at the informant/victim with their pistols causing injury in his stomach.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that as per the prosecution case, only

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9614 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025 2/3 material against the petitioner is confessional statement of coaccused Chhotu Kumar before the Police which has no evidentiary value. Hence, there is no legally admissible material against the petitioner and hence, deprivation of liberty of the petitioner on such material would be travesty of justice.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioner has been made accused in three other cases.

7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dalsing Sarai, Samastipur, in connection with Dalsing Sarai P.S. Case No. 137 of 2016,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9614 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025 3/3 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.PC and on the following conditions:

(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has criminal antecedents other than the disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.

(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J) S.Ali/- U T