Munna Das v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6266 of 2017 (3) dt.08-03-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6266 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -172 Year- 2016 Thana -DELHA District- GAYA ====================================================== Munna Das, S/o Rampyare Das @ Rampyare Ravidas, resident of Village - Kormathu, P.S. - Guraru, District - Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Delha P.S. Case No. 172 of 2016, registered under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

The accusation is that on receiving secret information about making plan to commit Dacoity in the house of Shankar Kanu, the police reached there and apprehended eight persons including the petitioner. On search, Shankar Sao was found in possession of one country made loaded pistol along with four live cartridges whereas Chotu Paswan was found in possession of two live cartridges.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6266 of 2017 (3) dt.08-03-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is said to be apprehended at the house of Shankar Kanu but nothing has been recovered from possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner is in custody since 02.10.2016.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Delha P.S. Case No. 172 of 2016. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T