Kumkum Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3740 of 2025 ====================================================== Kumkum Singh Wife of Sunil Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Mohaniya Ward No. 19, Goth Baruari P.S. and District Supaul, Bihar 852110 ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Commissioner-Cum-Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Commissioner-Cum-Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Directorate, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Principal Secrtary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5.
The Director, Mass Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 6.
The District Magistrate, Supaul .
7.
The District Education Officer, Supaul, District-Supaul 8.
The District Program Officer, Supaul, District-Supaul ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ravi Ranjan, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Sarvesh Kumar Singh, AAG-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 07-03-2025
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1.i. For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus, commanding and directing the respondent authorities to consider the case of the petitioner as also other similarly situated persons for extending their age of retirement from 60 years, as same has been done not only in several other departments of Bihar who could not discharge their work due to prolonged litigation and thus being at no fault on their part, they could not discharge the
Patna High Court CWJC No.3740 of 2025(2) dt.07-03-2025 2/2 normal tenure of service period also.
ii. For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other writ of similar nature writ commanding and directing the concerned respondent authorities not to allow the petitioner to retire and allow her to continue till extended period of retirement. "
2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondent authorities, for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.
3. The present writ petition stands disposed off. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U