Brahmdeo Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18155 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -69 Year- 2016 Thana -KHODABANDPUR District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Brahmdeo Singh, son of Late Ram Kishun Singh, resident of village Pir Nagar, P.S. Khodawandpur, Chhaurahi, Dist - Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Advocate For the Informant : Mr. Subodh Kumar Barnwal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Murlidhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Khodawandpur P.S.Case No. 69 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
Petitioner is father-in-law and the case is under Section 498A IPC.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is an old person and there is no specific allegation against him, rather allegation is general and omnibus and he is in custody since 3.12.2016.
Heard learned APP and learned counsel for the informant also. They have opposed the prayer for bail. Having heard both sides and considering the fact that
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18155 of 2017 (2) dt.21-04-2017 2/2 allegation is general and omnibus and petitioner has remained in custody for four months, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Manjhaul (Begusarai), in connection with Khodawandpur P.S.Case No. 69 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U