Upendra Roy @ Upendra Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.13882 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -114 Year- 2016 Thana -CHANDMUNDI District- JAMUI ====================================================== Upendra Roy @ Upendra Rai, son of Late Kameshwar Roy @ Bhola Roy resident of village - Garhi Simariya, Police Station - Chakai in the district of Jamui.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Chandramandi P.S.Case No. 114 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that on the statement of co-accused the petitioner has been apprehended in this case and he is in custody for about one month as neither he is PDS dealer nor is anyway concern with the seized article.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and considering the submission, as stated above, not controverted by learned APP, let
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13882 of 2017 (2) dt.23-03-2017 2/2 the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in connection with Chandramandi P.S.Case No. 114 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U