Sahjad @ Saka v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.11202 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -43 Year- 2016 Thana -SULTANGANG District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Sahjad @ Saka, Son of Md. Seraj, R/o Mohalla- Sahganj Chauraha, at present Renter in the House of Dilip of Banwari Chowk, Police StationSultanganj, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shyamal Prakash For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anil Kumar Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 22-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.
The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 27.09.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. 38211 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 23.02.2016 and liberty was given to him to renew his prayer after remaining one year in custody and now the petitioner has remained in custody for more than one year and, as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration. The learned A.P.P. does not oppose the aforesaid submission.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11202 of 2017 (3) dt.22-03-2017 2/2 bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Ashutosh Kumar Rai, the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna City, District Patna, in connection with Tr. No. 3715 of 2016 (G.R. No. 608 of 2016) arising out of Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 43 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T