Shiv Balak Poddar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.9612 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-493 Year-2018 Thana- BARAUNI District- Begusarai ====================================================== SHIV BALAK PODDAR S/o Late Nathui Poddar village-Harpur, P.SBarauni Refinary, Dist- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Manoj Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 18-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Barauni Refinary P.S. Case No. 493 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased. He further submits that in the written report specific allegation of making demand of dowry is against the husband of the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation levelled against this petitioner in the FIR.
Learned counsel for informant has appeared and opposed the prayer for bail. He has submitted that there is allegation against this petitioner of committing torture with
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9612 of 2019(2) dt.18-02-2019 2/2 daughter of the informant.
Petitioner is in custody since 26.10.2018 having clean antecedent.
Considering the aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Barauni Refinary P.S. Case No. 493 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:- (i) Both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the Court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.
(iii) If petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/mu keshU T