Sonu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.15726 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -143 Year- 2016 Thana -NABINAGAR District- AURANGABAD ======================================================
1. Sonu Paswan, Son of Vira Paswan, resident of village - Patthra, P.S. Husainabad, District - Palamu ( Jharkhand ) .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Akshay Lal Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 21-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 143 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Allegedly, the informant was coming from Nabinagar market, then near Bara Pain, some miscreants snatched his motorcycle and fired upon him, which hit his right arm and chest. During investigation the name of the petitioner transpired and the petitioner confessed his guilt also.
Submission is of false implication and that besides confessional statement of the petitioner, there is nothing against
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15726 of 2017 (2) dt.21-04-2017 2/2 him and the confessional statement made before the police, has got no evidentiary value in the eye of law and, as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.
The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that the petitioner has confessed his guilt.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Aurangabad in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 143 of 2016 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T