Sheru Khatun @ Sherun Khatun v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12413 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -84 Year- 2016 Thana -ISHOPUR District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Sheru Khatun @ Sherun Khatun Wife of Late Fakrudin @ Fekan @ Md. Fakrudin Ansari, Resident of Village- Nauwa Toli, Police Station- Pirpainti, District- Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Viveka Nandsingh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-03-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Ishipur (Barahat) P.S.Case No.84 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that as per confessional statement of the co-accused before the Police and the confessional statement of this accused, nothing has come against this petitioner. The petitioner is a lady and in custody since 09.10.2016.

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who could not controvert the aforesaid fact.

Having heard both sides and in view of submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, as stated above, and also

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12413 of 2017 (3) dt.28-03-2017 2/2 considering the period of custody of the petitioner as well as the fact that she is a lady, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ishipur (Barahat) P.S.Case No.84 of 2016 in connection with I/C A.C.J.M. VIII, Bhagalpur. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U