Daijee Devi @ Dayg Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9890 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2025 Thana- ALINAGAR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Daijee Devi @ Dayg Devi W/o- Ram Lakhan Sada R/v- Lilpur Ps- Alinagar Dist- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 10149 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2025 Thana- ALINAGAR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Rubi Devi Daughter of Ram Lakhan sada Resident of Village-Lilpur, P.sAlinagar, District-Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 9890 of 2026) For the Petitioner :
Mr. Krishna Chandra, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 10149 of 2026) For the Petitioner :
Mr. Krishna Chandra, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2026 Heard Mr. Krishna Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioners in both the cases and Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, learned APP for the State in Cr. Misc. No. 9890 of 2026 and Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, learned APP for the State in Cr. Misc. No. 10149 of 2026.
2. Petitioners seek bail, who are in custody since
2/4 29.11.2025 and 10.09.2025 respectively, in connection with Alinagar P.S. Case No. 200 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 09.09.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1) & 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they in connivance with his family members have assaulted Jhameli Sada with lathi and danda as result of which she died.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have clean antecedents and they have been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. and the informant has raised suspicion against these petitioners merely on the ground that the petitioners are in-laws and wife of the deceased. He further submits that except the suspicion, no other cogent material has come during investigation to suggest the involvement of these petitioners in the present occurrence and apart from that the informant is not an eye witness of the alleged occurrence and only one injury was found on the person of the deceased. The petitioners are in custody since 29.11.2025 and 10.09.2025.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the
3/4 State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Benipur, Darbhanga in connection with Alinagar P.S. Case No. 200 of 2025, subject to the following conditions :-
(1) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for
4/4 cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T