Kumari Arti v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16653 of 2018 ====================================================== Kumari Arti Wife of Sri Abhay Nath Mishra, Resident of Village- Sajhuar, P.S.- Benipur, District- Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, I.C.D.S. Directorate, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Inspecting Officer, I.C.D.S. Directorate, Bihar, Patna. 5.

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga at Darbhanga. 6.

The District Programme Officer, Darbhanga at Darbhanga. 7.

The Block Development Officer, Benipur, District- Darbhanga. 8.

The Child Development Programme Officer, Block- Benipur, DistrictDarbhanga. 9.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Sajhuar, Block- Benipur, DistrictDarbhanga. 10.

The Women Supervisor of Ward No.13 under Gram Panchayat Raj- Sajhuar, Block- Benipur, District- Dar null null 11.

The Ward Member of Ward No.13 under Gram Panchayat Raj Sajhuar, Block- Benipur, District- Darbhanga ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha- GA-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 03-09-2024 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However counsel for the State are present.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for direction to the respondent authority to prepare and publish a fresh Mapping Register of ward no. 13 under Gram Panchayat Raj-Sajhuar, Block-Benipur, and District-Darbhanga for

Patna High Court CWJC No.16653 of 2018(2) dt.03-09-2024 2/2 selection of Anganwari Sevika/Sahayika and further to keep the appointment in abeyance.

3. Counsel for the State submits that grievance of the petitioner has been settled in the light of the statement made in Paragraph 11 of the counter affidavit in which it has been specifically mentioned that the petitioner's grievance has been resolved by the respondent authority and petitioner is fully satisfied with the report and as his consent, she has signed on the survey report.

4. Upon perusal of the records, it transpires to this Court that objection was made on the mapping register and subsequently, mapping register was made by the respondents in presence of petitioner and as per the pleadings made in Paragraph 11 of the counter affidavit, the grievance of the petitioner has been resolved and that petitioner has signed on the said survey report, and hence, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Sunnykr/- U