← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6179/2021disposed

Motilal Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2022-01-28Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6179 of 2021 ====================================================== Motilal Sah Son of Late Raji Sah Resident of Village - Machhargawan, Nawada P.S. - Kotwa, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Bihar, Patna 2.

The Addl. Director General of Police, Technical Services, Bihar, Patna 3.

The Inspector General of Police, Home Guard, Bihar, Patna 4.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari 5.

The Superintendent of Police, East Champaran, Motihari 6.

The Commandant, Bihar Home Guard Police, Patna 7.

The Divisional Commandant, Bihar Home guard Police, Muzaffarpur 8.

The District Commandant Bihar Home Guard Police, East Champaran, Motihari 9.

The Dy. Superintendent of Police (Home Guard), Police Centre, Motihari 10.

The Supervisor, VHF Control, Motihari.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhurendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Suman Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 28-01-2022 The matter is heard via video conferencing due to circumstances prevailing on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.

2. In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following relief/reliefs:

"That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondent concern to pay the allowance to the petitioner for the period 1st January 2019 to 31st May 2019 during which he was deputed in Very High Frequency (VHF) Control Room, Motihari but he has not been paid the allowance.

Patna High Court CWJC No.6179 of 2021 dt.28-01-2022 2/2 And for any other relief (s) for which the petitioner is found to be entitled in the facts and circumstances of this case."

3. The counter affidavit is silent about passing a speaking order whether petitioner is entitled for the relief sought in the present petition read with the representation, therefore, the concerned respondent is hereby directed to pass a speaking order as to why the petitioner is not entitled. Such order shall be passed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order and communicate to the petitioner.

4. Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed off. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) GAURAV S./- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 31.01.2022 Transmission Date