Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20159/2017dismissed

Anil Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-08Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20159 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -165 Year- 2014 Thana -AMNAUR District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Anil Sahani Son of Baijnath Sahani @ Sukul Sahani, Resident of VillageBadhichak Dehi, P.S.- Maker, District- Saran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-02-2018 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Amnour P.S. Case No. 165 of 2014, registered for offences punishable under Sections 447, 427, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 /4 of Explosive Substance Act and Section 16(1)b, 16(a), 18, 19 and 20 of the unlawful Activities Act, 1967. Allegation as per F.I.R is that petitioner and others exploded away the brick kiln of the informant. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been made accused in this case only on the basis of suspicion and he has been remanded in this case from other case. Further he has been in judicial custody since 11.03.2016 and other coaccused of this case has already been enlarged on bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20159 of 2017 (8) dt.08-02-2018 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that petitioner is an accused in four other cases of similar nature; I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.

This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

However, the trial court is directed to expedite, the trial and try to conclude the same within a period of nine months and if the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period, petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T