Sankar Prajapat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20585 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2020 Thana- TANKUPPA District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

SANKAR PRAJAPAT S/o Gyani Prajapat Resident of Village- Utalibara, P.O.- Utalibar, P.S.- Tankuppa, Dist- Gaya.

2.

BHUNESHWAR PRAJAPAT S/o Lildhari Prajapat R/o Village- Utalibara, P.O.- Utalibar, P.S.- Tankuppa, Dist- Gaya 3.

PHUNNU PANDIT S/o Ganesh Prajapat R/o Village- Utalibara, P.O.- Utalibar, P.S.- Tankuppa, Dist- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binoy Kumar Sinha 1 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 20-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Tankuppa P.S. Case no. 60 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution story relates to abuse and assault to the informant by the petitioners and other co-accused persons.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20585 of 2021(2) dt.20-12-2021 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are is innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. There is case and counter case between the parties. Both parties have received simple injuries in alleged occurrence. They have got no criminal antecedent. The matter relates to civil dispute.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Tankuppa P.S. Case no. 60 of 2020, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-I, Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U