Patna High CourtCWJC/5038/2014dismissed

Mahasundari Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-10-03Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5038 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Mahasundari Devi Wife Of Late Kailashpati Singh Resident Of Village - Raunia, P.S. Naubatpur, District - Patna, Present Address C/O Ram Sadan Singh, Mithila Colony, P.O. Bataganj, Digha, Patna - 18 .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary, Planning Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director, Statistics, Planning Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

3. The Joint Director - Cum - Chief Registrar, ( Birth And Death ), Directorate Of Economics And Statistics, Department Of Planning, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

4. The District Magistrate, Patna

5. The Block Development Officer, Naubatpur, District - Patna

6. The Panchayat Sewak, Gram Panchayat - Ajawan Rauniya, Karai, Naubatpur Block, District - Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shekhar Singh Mr. Shree Nivas Madhuvan For the Respondent/s : Mr. J.K. Roy, S.C.-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 03-10-2016 Mr. Singh for the petitioner and Mr. J.K. Roy, S.C.- 13 for the State are present.

A counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 4 to 6. In paragraph 13 thereof, it is stated that the B.D.O., Naubatpur vide order dated 18.05.2015 has already informed the A.D.M., Disaster Management, Patna that the death certificate of the petitioner dated 29.10.1993 has already been cancelled by the Panchayat Secretary. Having said so, in paragraph 14, the respondents have stated as under:- "14. That it is humbly submitted that it is

Patna High Court CWJC No.5038 of 2014 (2) dt.03-10-2016 2/2 apparent from the aforesaid facts that the respondent authorities have taken needful action for redressal of the grievance of the petitioner in the aforesaid matter."

Counsel for the petitioner, having appreciated the aforesaid fact, states that the application has now become infructuous.

The application is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Pankaj/- U