Raju Das @ Rajendra Das v. Raghunath Kanu And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.210 of 2019 ====================================================== Raju Das @ Rajendra Das, Chela of Rajdeo Das and son of Saral Chaudhary Resident of Village- Bhagwanpur, P.S- Hathuwa, District- Gopalganj at present- Poojari Sri Ram Janki Mandir, at Village- Bhulauni, P.S- Nautan, District- Siwan ... ...Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Raghunath Kanu son of Sahdeo Kanu 2.

Shiv Nath Kanu son of Sahdeo Kanu 3.

Yadu Nath Kanu son of Sahdeo Kanu 4.

Sri Ganesh Kanu son of Baldeo Kanu 5.

Heera lal Kanu son of Baldeo Kanu 6.

Kedar Kanu son of Baldeo Kanu 7.

Durga Kanu son of Baldeo Kanu 8.

Manoj Kanu son of Late Moti Lal Kanu 9.

Ram Ashish Kanu son of Late Bhagirath Kanu 10.

Anil Kanu son of Late Moti Lal Kanu 11.

Ram Narayan Kanu son of Late Dharmdeo Kanu 12.

Umesh Kanu son of Ram Narayan Kanu 13.

Dinesh Kanu son of Ram Narayan Kanu All are resident of village- Bhulauni, P.S-Nautan, District- Siwan 14.

Sri Ram Janki Bhagwan through Poojari Ram Balak Das (now dead), resident of village- Bhulauni, P.S-Nautan, District- Siwan ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh, Advocate : Mr. Sri Priya Singh, Advocate ; Mr.Abhishek, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-04-2019 At the outset, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that erroneously an application was filed by the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10(2) and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'CPC') whereas the

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.210 of 2019(2) dt.05-04-2019 2/2 application should have been filed under Order 22 Rule 5 of the CPC.

He submitted that the instant application challenging the order dated 15.11.2018 passed by the learned Munsif-II, Siwan in Title Suit No. 48 of 2000 by which prayer of the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10(2) and Section 151 of the CPC for being added as party has been rejected be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an application under Order 22 Rule 5 of the CPC.

In view of the submission made above, the instant application preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is disposed of with liberty aforesaid.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Md. S/-sneha U