Queyamuddin Ansari @ Md. Kyamuddin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 10731 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2021 Thana- RASULPUR District- Saran ====================================================== QUEYAMUDDIN ANSARI @ MD. KYAMUDDIN ANSARI Son of Late Md. Sirajuddin Ansari Resident of Village - Chanchaura, P.s.- Rasulpur, Distt.- Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Wazifan Bibi @ Wazifan Khatoon @ Bibi Wazifan Khatoon W/o Queyamuddin Ansari @ Md. Kyamuddin Ansari Resident of Village - Chanchaura, P.s.- Rasulpur, Distt.- Saran at Chapra, D/o Salauddin Ansaqri Resident of Village - Mahui, P.s.- Manjhi, Distt.- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Krishna Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-07-2022 Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 216 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 494 of the Indian Penal Code. Both parties are ready to settle the dispute by way of one time settlement.

Without going into merit of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on provisional bail for a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 10731 of 2022(2) dt.11-07-2022 2/2 order to the court concerned on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Anupama, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 216 of 2021, subject to following conditions:- The court below is directed to make suitable effort for the purpose of conciliation between the parties. The petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 would have the opportunity to work out an amicable resolution of the issue. If an amicable resolution is worked out within two months, petitioner would be entitled to confirmation of his provisional bail.

If, on the other hand, the issue is not resolved between the parties, the court below, needles to say, would be well within its jurisdiction to exercise its judicial discretion and pass appropriate orders, which may include cancellation of the petitioner's provisional bail.

The application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) amitkr/- U T