Patna High CourtCR. WJC/976/2016withdrawn

Kunti Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through Superintendent Of Ploice, Rohtas And ORS

2016-09-28The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.976 of 2016 (2) dt.28-09-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.976 of 2016 ====================================================== Kunti Devi daughter of Ashok Chaudhary resident of Village- Patthar Gali, No.-6, P.O.- Dehri on Sone, P.S.- Dehri, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Superintendent of Police, Rohtas.

2. The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas.

3. The Officer-in-charge, Dehri on Sone Police Station, Rohtas.

4. The State of Jharkhand through Superintendent of Police, Ranchi.

5. The Superintendent of Police, Ranchi.

6. The Officer-in-charge, Chutia Police Station, Ranchi.

7. Dilip Chaudhary son of Late Ramesh Chaudhary resident of Gosai Tola, P.S.- Chutia, District- Ranchi .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Parthasarthy, GA 4. Mr. Mrigendra Kumar, AC to GA 4 For the state of Jharkhand : Mr. Satyawrat Verma, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 28-09-2016 Heard Mr. Amish Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Parthsarthy, learned Counsel for the Respondents. We have heard also Mr. Satyawrat Verma, learned Counsel for the State of Jharkhand.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application in future.

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.976 of 2016 (2) dt.28-09-2016 No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

(I.A. Ansari,CJ) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Prakash/- U T