Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4359/2016bail granted

Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar

2016-02-01Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4359 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -251 Year- 2015 Thana -DIHRINAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Son of Kailash Yadav

2. Ramesh Mahto @ Ramesh Kumar Son of Prasad Mahto .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kr.Sharma(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-02-2016 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 353, 337, 338, 307, 420, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 27 of the Arms Act, sections 33/41/42 of the Indian Forest Act, section 4 (1),(1A) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act and Rule 40(1) of the Bihar Minor and Minerals Concession Rules.

Prosecution case is that the police raided the place of running illegal crusher unit, when the crusher machine was seized then the villagers attacked the police force. A 'dumpher' was found parked near the crusher unit and the petitioners were identified as

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4359 of 2016 (2) dt.01-02-2016 2/2 a member of the mob.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that accusation is against the mob only on suspicion; the petitioners have been roped in the present case. A statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Considering the accusation is omnibus and general against the petitioner, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Dihri, Rohtas in connection with Dihri Nagar P.S. Case No.251/2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Ashwini/- U T