Md. Jakir @ Md. Zakir v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15513 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2020 Thana- RAHIKA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Md. Jakir @ Md. Zakir, Son of Sadrul Jamma @ Sadrujjama Resident of Village- Balat, P.S. Rahika, District-Madhubani 2.

Mohd. Shakir, Son of Sadrul Jamma @ Sadrujjama Resident of VillageBalat, P.S. Rahika, District-Madhubani 3.

Md. Shahid, Son of Sadrul Jamma @ Sadrujjama Resident of Village- Balat, P.S. Rahika, District-Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-04-2024

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Rahika P. S. Case No.86 of 2020, instituted for the offences under Sections 143, 341, 323, 504, 307, 325 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners had moved earlier seeking anticipatory bail application by filing Cr. Misc. No.42238 of 2022, but then, the same was permitted to be withdrawn by an order dated 12.12.2022. It is further submitted that petitioners and the informant are agnates and they are having dispute relating to land. It is also submitted that on intervention of well-wishers, the parties have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15513 of 2024(3) dt.20-04-2024 2/2 compromised, as such, no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioners to jail as the informant would not support the case of the prosecution.

4. The learned Additional P. P. submits that if the parties have compromised, then the same can be brought to the notice of the learned trial Court when the petitioners surrenders, on which the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the instant anticipatory bail application.

5. Permission is accorded.

6. Accordingly, instant application is dismissed as withdrawn.

7. However, in the event, if the petitioners surrender on or before 01.05.2024, the learned trial Court shall try to dispose of the anticipatory bail application on the same day provided the learned lawyer on behalf of the informant accepts the compromise. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T