← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17022/2016dismiss for nonprosecution

Shashi Lata v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-11-29Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17022 of 2016 ====================================================== Shashi Lata W/o Kashinath Pandey Resident of village - Bhabhua Ward No. 19, P.S. and P.O. Bhabhua, District - Kaimur ( Bhabhua ) Library Assistant Mahila Inter College, Bhabhua ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary Education and Human Resources Department

2. The Director Secondary Education Department Bihar, Patna

3. The Deputy Director Secondary Education and Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna

4. The District Education Officer, Kaimur, Bhabhua

5. The District Appellate Authority Kaimur, Bhabhua

6. The Secondary Mahilla ( Women ) Inter College Bhabhua Kaimur

7. Smt. Bimala Tripathi W/o Madan Tripathi R/o village - Sukharipur, P.O. Miuon, Distt. Kaimur ( Bhabhua ) At Present Principal Mahilla ( Women ) Inter College Bhabhua Kaimur

8. Asha Kumari W/o Ram Bhawan Singh Lecturer Mahilla Inter College Bhabhua Kaimur

9. Shobha Nath Singh Kushwaha S/o not Known R/o village - Akari, P.O. Akhalashpur, P.S. Bhabhua, Distt. Kaimur ( retired Clerk ) Mahilla Inter College Bhabhua Kaimur ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

None For the Respondents :

Abhanjali, AC to GA12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 29-11-2018 Learned counsel for the State while raising objection regarding maintainability of the writ petition submits that as per Rule 13 of the Bihar Rajya Vidyalaya Shikshak & Karmchari Shikayat Nivaran Niyamavali, 2013 vide resolution no. 1880 dated 20.12.2013 of the Education Department, Bihar, it is mandatory provision that if any teacher is aggrieved by the order of recruitment/Niyojan Unit, he/she has to approach the District Appellate Authority.

Since none appears for the petitioner, without going

Patna High Court CWJC No.17022 of 2016(2) dt.29-11-2018 2/2 into the merits of the submission made by State counsel, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) Shashi U