← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2156/2016disposed

Ganesh Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-03-26Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2156 of 2016 ====================================================== Ganesh Bhagat, Son of Late Harihar Bhagat Resident of Village- Sanahpur, Police Station- Singhwara, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Departmnet, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. null null

2. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Muzaffarpur, DistrictMuzaffarpur.

4. The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

5. The Block Development Officer, Katra Block, District- Muzaffarpur.

6. The Block Education Officer, Katra Block, District- Muzaffarpur.

7. The Executive Officer, Gram Secretary/Sachiv Prakhand Teachers Employment Committee/Unit, Katra Prakhand, District- Muzaffarpur.

8. The Head Master, Upgraded Middle School, Singhwari, Tole- Rajghat, BlockKatra, District- Muzaffarpur.

9. The District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

10. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Pahsaul, Block- Katra, District- Muzaffarpur.

11. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj, Katra Block, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gajendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rai Shivaji Nath, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 26-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 14.11.2015, passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, as contained in Annexure-16. The writ petition was filed on 1.2.2016 and thereafter the State Appellate Authority has been made functional.

In view of the subsequent development when the State Appellate Authority is available to hear the appeal against the

Patna High Court CWJC No.2156 of 2016(4) dt.26-03-2018 2/2 decision of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, it would be appropriate if the petitioner approaches the State Appellate Authority for redressal of his grievance by way of filing appeal. In the event the petitioner files appeal within a period of one month from today, the State Appellate Authority is required to decide the appeal on its own merit in accordance with law after condoning the delay, if any, in filing the appeal in view of the fact that the present writ petition remained pending for more than two years.

With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U