Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13185/2017bail granted

Suresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-04Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13185 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -886 Year- 2016 Thana -SAHARSA District- SAHARSA ======================================================

1. Suresh Yadav, S/o Jagdish Yadav, R/o Vill- Simraha, P.S.- Saharsa Sadar, Dist- Saharsa.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Neeraj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-04-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Saharsa (Sadar) P.S.Case No.886 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 302, 324, 326, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the informant is son-in-law of the petitioner and except suspicion, there is nothing against the petitioner. He is in custody since 15.11.2016. Heard learned A.P.P. also, who could not controvert the above facts.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13185 of 2017 (3) dt.04-04-2017 2/2 satisfaction of C.J.M., Saharsa in connection with (Saharsa) Sadar P.S.Case No.886 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U