← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10801/2022bail granted

Rajesh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-24Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10801 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-824 Year-2019 Thana- BUXAR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBuxar ====================================================== 1.

RAJESH PRASAD Son of Lakshman Prasad Resident of Village - High School Road, Barhampur, P.S.- Brahampur, Distt.- Buxar. 2.

Chandan Prasad Son of Lakshman Prasad Resident of Village - High School Road, Barhampur, P.S.- Brahampur, Distt.- Buxar. 3.

Praduman Kumar Son of Lakshman Prasad Resident of Village - High School Road, Barhampur, P.S.- Brahampur, Distt.- Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Ashim Kumar Son of Late Pradip Kumar Prasad Resident of Village - and P.O.- Brahampur, P.S.- Brahampur, Distt.- Buxara. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bandana Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 24-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 824( C) of 2019 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 392/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, complainant is an advocate and after completing his work in Kachhari, he was coming to his village then petitioners along with other accused persons armed with pistol fired upon him and snatched Rs. 33,000/-. It is further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10801 of 2022(3) dt.24-08-2022 2/2 alleged that they have given him life threatening if he will file a case against the accused persons.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. No one has received any type of injury. They have been falsely implicated in this case. They have got no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No. 824(c ) of 2019, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Buxar subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U