Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18426 of 2018 ====================================================== Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Singh son of Late Indra Deo Singh, Resident of Village- Karath, Police Station- Tarari, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Collector, Rohtas at Sasaram.

3.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Sasaram, Rohtas. 4.

The Circle Officer, Sasaram, Rohtas.

5.

Sri Dalai Nonia son of Late Chanawa @ Chana Nonia, resident of VillageThekahi, Balirampur, Police Station- Nokha, District- Rohtas. 6.

Suresh Khatik son of Late Shobha Khatik, resident of Village- Admapur, Police Station- Sasaram M, District- Rohtas.

7.

Jai Ram Vishwakarma son of Ram Bachan Sharma. 8.

Rinku Ansari son of Late Nezamuddin Ansari.

9.

Daroga Ansari son of Late Nezamuddin Ansari.

10.

Dilwas Ansari son of Late Ramzan Ali.

11.

Mansur Ali son of Late Ramzan Ali.

12.

Md. Ali Ahmad, son of Late Ramzan Ali. The Respondent nos. 7 to 12 are resident of Village and Post Office- Amri, Karwandia, Police StationSasaram M, District- Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Respondent/s :

Mrs. Nutan Sahay, AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 22-09-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though the State is present.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:

(i) for issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ directing Respondent no. 4 to issue

Patna High Court CWJC No.18426 of 2018(4) dt.22-09-2025 2/2 rent receipts in favour of the petitioner in view of the order passed in Land Dispute Appeal No. 712/2014, dated 08.03.16, by the Divisional Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.

3. On 25.03.2025 and 22.08.2025 before the different coordinate benches, there was no appearance.

4. It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in the case.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U