Imran Jauhar @ Md. Imran Jauhar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11780 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-426 Year-2019 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== IMRAN JAUHAR @ MD. IMRAN JAUHAR Son of Late Sk. Hasnain Resident of village - Imadpatti, P.S.- Chakia, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-04-2023 Heard the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 384, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and 66A and 67 of the I.T Act. Allegedly, the petitioner demanded ransom from the informant from the development work of Panchayat and on refusal, the petitioner threatened the informant and also wrote abusive and defamative matters in regard to him and his family members and made it viral on social network.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and have committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11780 of 2023(2) dt.27-04-2023 2/2 omnibus in nature. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner is a ward member and when the informant being Mukhiya defaulcated amount of Rs.21,00,000/- sanctioned for Nal-Jal scheme and did not make proper work under Nal-Jal scheme, then the petitioner gave application to BDO, Chakia, DDC, Motihari thereafter, the informant implicated the petitioner in the present case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No.426 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T